THE CHILDREN WERE HONEST

There are certain truths adults spend years learning how to disguise.

Children have not yet acquired that skill.

A man may spend a lifetime cultivating dignity, choosing flattering clothing, developing a respectable career, and persuading himself that his physical peculiarities are merely charming characteristics. Then a child walks into the room, studies him for three seconds, and announces the matter with the brutal efficiency of a courtroom verdict.

This happened to Harold.

Among the grown-ups, Harold was treated with considerable tact. His friends referred to him as distinguished. One particularly diplomatic neighbor called him “a man of striking features.” At dinner parties, nobody mentioned the obvious.

The children had no such reservations.

“Mr. Harold, can you reach that?”

“Hey, Harold, your ears are enormous.”

“Harold, why is your head shaped like that?”

They were not being malicious. That was the problem. They were simply reporting their observations, much as they might report that it was raining or that the dog had eaten the newspaper.

Harold tried to laugh along.

The adults, meanwhile, became increasingly inventive. They spoke of his “generous proportions,” his “unusual profile,” and his “remarkable presence.” One young man, attempting to demonstrate exceptional courtesy, eventually abandoned adjectives altogether and referred to him as “Sir.”

But the children remained wonderfully, mercilessly precise.

And perhaps there was something useful in it. Harold had spent years receiving compliments so carefully polished that they had ceased to contain any information whatsoever.

The children, on the other hand, had looked at him once and told him exactly what they saw.

It may not have been the gentlest education a man could receive.

But it was certainly the most honest.

THE STRANGE PEOPLE OF THE AMAZON

Deep in the less-traveled reaches of the Amazon basin, explorers have occasionally reported encountering communities whose customs seem to have been designed specifically to frustrate modern anthropology. There are villages built along rivers, settlements concealed beneath enormous trees, and, according to several increasingly questionable field journals, one particularly peculiar society known as the Reclining Women.

For decades, scholars showed very little interest in them. This was partly because the tribe appeared to have developed an almost religious devotion to poor posture. Their inhabitants leaned, sagged, slouched, folded themselves into improbable angles, and generally behaved as though the human skeleton were an optional suggestion rather than an important piece of biological infrastructure.

Consequently, serious researchers found the subject difficult to approach with academic dignity. Spending several years documenting a population that appeared unable to sit upright without considerable effort did not seem likely to advance anyone’s career.

That attitude has changed.

In recent years, amateur explorers, eccentric naturalists, and people who have accumulated an astonishing amount of specialized equipment without ever obtaining a recognizable scientific credential have begun making expeditions into the region. They return with notebooks filled with observations, blurry photographs, and increasingly elaborate theories about the inhabitants.

The great questions remain unanswered.

What exactly holds these people upright?

Why do they refuse to use chairs properly?

Do they actually possess skeletons, or have they simply misplaced them?

And perhaps most importantly, when one of them asks what time it is, does anyone have the courage to look at a watch?

Anthropology may eventually provide the answers.

Until then, the Amazon remains full of mysteries, including at least one population that seems to have declared war on posture itself.

THE BOY WHO CAUSED NO TROUBLE

Young Thomas had been entrusted with an errand of almost breathtaking simplicity. His father needed a few postage stamps, and the nearest shop had one of those little vending machines that supposedly allowed civilization to function without the assistance of another human being.

Thomas put in his money.

Nothing happened.

He tried again, with the patient determination of a child who has not yet learned that machines are frequently indifferent to human suffering. The machine remained silent. After a final unsuccessful attempt, he decided that standing in front of it indefinitely would accomplish very little, so he set off toward the main post office a few streets away.

The walk presented no particular difficulties. He passed a bakery, a shop selling garden tools, and a store displaying an extraordinary number of lamps for reasons he could not quite understand. Eventually he reached the post office, where he purchased the stamps in less than five minutes and headed home.

When he arrived, the family dog rushed out to greet him, and his father called from the kitchen to ask whether he had managed to get the stamps.

Thomas held them up triumphantly.

His father examined them, smiled, and congratulated him on making the sensible decision to find another solution when the vending machine refused to cooperate. It was, he declared, exactly the sort of practical judgment one hoped a young man would develop.

Thomas was rewarded with an unusually generous helping of pie after dinner.

He went upstairs, changed into his pajamas, climbed into bed, and fell asleep almost immediately.

Nothing remotely scandalous happened.

No seductress appeared.

No forbidden romance developed.

No mysterious woman dragged him into a life of decadence.

He bought some stamps, ate pie, and went to sleep.

For a story entitled The Women Who Could Not Control Their Passions, this was, admittedly, a rather disappointing afternoon.

THE LADY OF CONSIDERABLE DISTINCTION

She possessed all the qualities one might reasonably hope to find in a woman of breeding. Her education was impeccable, her manners were polished, and she carried herself with the effortless assurance of someone who had never once been required to apologize for taking up space. She came from an old and prosperous family, spoke with precision, and had mastered that particular aristocratic art of making even an ordinary afternoon tea seem faintly ceremonial.

Her acquaintances addressed her formally. Those who had earned the privilege of greater familiarity used her given name, usually accompanied by an affectionate smile and the comfortable informality of long friendship.

I never managed either.

To me, she was simply Lady Ample Bosom.

It was not meant disrespectfully. Quite the opposite. I admired her intelligence, appreciated her wit, and found her company genuinely delightful. She could dismantle a bad argument with a single raised eyebrow and had a talent for making the dullest social gathering considerably less dull.

But there was one characteristic that distinguished her from everyone else I had ever met.

She had the jugs.

And, whatever else may be said about the woman, she had them in abundance.

A Monday Round in Perfect September Weather

There are certain September days in New England when the weather seems almost purpose-built for golf. Today was one of them. Sixty-five degrees, crystal clear, virtually no humidity, a lightness to the air that you simply don’t get in July or August, and just enough autumn creeping into the landscape to remind you that the really good golf weather has a limited shelf life. The rain from yesterday and this morning had left the course with some residual moisture, but it wasn’t the sort of wetness that ruins a round. If anything, it gave the turf that deep, saturated green appearance that makes a golf course look particularly good in early fall.

I had managed to get out of the hospital a little earlier than usual, which created the sort of narrow window of opportunity that golfers are genetically programmed to recognize. There are probably several responsible things a surgeon could do with an unexpectedly early departure from work. I did none of them. I went home, changed, grabbed the clubs, and loaded them into the BMW M8. The clubs went into the trunk, the golf shoes came along, and the rest of the afternoon belonged to the course.

I’m a member of a country club, and every once in a while I feel compelled to remind myself that membership dues and fees are considerably easier to justify when I actually use the place. There is something satisfying about arriving at your own club on a weekday afternoon, particularly when the weather is this good, knowing you don’t have to negotiate a tee-time safari or drive halfway across the state in search of an open course. The only real question was whether I could put together eighteen reasonably competent holes after spending the first part of the day thinking about medicine instead of golf.

The answer, ultimately, was yes.

It was a decent-to-good day on the links. Not one of those rounds where every part of the game seems to synchronize and the scorecard starts looking suspiciously better than your normal standard. I didn’t have that kind of day. But I also didn’t have one of those rounds where you spend eighteen holes wondering why you bothered bringing the clubs. There was enough good golf scattered throughout the round to make it satisfying, and enough mediocre golf to provide the usual reminders that the game has a wonderfully efficient way of exposing every flaw in your swing, your judgment, and occasionally your emotional stability.

The course was playing somewhat differently from how it does when the ground is completely dry. The rain had softened the fairways and greens, and that changes the mathematics of the game more than people sometimes appreciate. A soft fairway doesn’t necessarily mean an easier course. You may get a little less roll off the tee, which can turn a drive that normally leaves a short iron into one requiring a mid-iron. On the other hand, approaches can hold their lines better, and the greens generally become more receptive. The trade-off is that wet turf demands a little more attention to contact. The temptation is to get steep, especially with an iron, because you subconsciously expect the club to dig. That’s exactly what you don’t want. Good ball striking still requires the club to enter the turf after the ball, with the low point of the swing properly forward.

My ball striking was reasonably solid throughout the round. The driver wasn’t perfect, but it was good enough that I wasn’t spending the afternoon playing defense from behind trees. That’s an underrated component of scoring. You don’t necessarily need to bomb every drive. You need to put the ball in a position where the next shot remains uncomplicated. There were a few swings where I caught the driver slightly away from the center of the face and paid the usual penalty, but the majority of the tee shots were playable. The better swings produced that familiar sensation of catching the ball slightly on the upswing, with the clubhead accelerating through impact rather than being guided into it.

The difference between a good drive and an average drive is often less dramatic than people imagine. It can be a matter of a few degrees of face angle, a fraction of an inch on the clubface, or a swing path that moves slightly too far left or right. The frustrating part of golf is that you can make what feels like essentially the same swing twice and receive two completely different results. The rewarding part is that every once in a while you make the swing correctly and the ball behaves exactly as the laws of physics said it should.

The irons were probably the most consistent part of my game today. I was generally striking them cleanly enough to control trajectory and distance, although there were certainly a few shots where the clubface and I disagreed about the intended destination. My better iron shots had the characteristics you want: ball-first contact, a shallow but descending strike, and a divot beginning just beyond the ball rather than underneath it. Those are the swings that make the game feel simple. You pick a target, commit to the shot, make the swing, and watch the ball take off on the intended line.

There were also a few approaches where the wet conditions made club selection particularly interesting. A soft green can encourage you to fire directly at the flag because you know the ball isn’t going to release as much. But that’s precisely where pin location matters. A front pin with trouble short requires a different calculation than a back pin with a large landing area. Golf isn’t simply about hitting the ball toward the hole. It’s about managing where the ball is allowed to finish. Sometimes the smartest target is fifteen feet away from the flag because fifteen feet leaves you twenty feet of acceptable error, while aiming directly at the flag might leave you with only five.

That was one of the recurring themes of the round: trying to separate the shot I wanted to hit from the shot I actually needed to hit.

The long game gave me enough opportunities to score, but the short game determined whether I actually capitalized on them. Around the greens, the softer conditions were both helpful and annoying. Helpful because the turf had enough moisture that a properly struck chip could land predictably without racing across the green. Annoying because any tendency to get too much grass between the clubface and the ball was magnified. The key was controlling the low point and resisting the urge to help the ball into the air. The club already has loft. It doesn’t need assistance.

A few chips came off exactly as intended, landing on the chosen spot and releasing toward the hole. Others reminded me that the difference between a good chip and a mediocre one is often nothing more than a few inches of contact. When you catch it cleanly, the ball comes off hot and the rollout can exceed expectations. Catch it slightly heavy and suddenly you’ve converted a straightforward up-and-down into a test of damage control.

The putting surface was another matter entirely. The greens weren’t exactly fast, but they weren’t dead either, and the residual moisture introduced just enough uncertainty to require attention to pace. On days like this, I find myself more concerned with speed than with line. A putt that misses its intended line by an inch but finishes eighteen inches past the hole is usually more frustrating than one that dies six inches short. The goal is to leave yourself a realistic second putt. Three-putting is rarely caused by the final stroke. It usually begins with a poor first putt.

There were some good putts today, some routine two-putts, and a few that refused to cooperate despite what appeared to be perfectly reasonable reads. That’s golf. You can stand over a ten-foot putt, read the break from every possible angle, make what feels like a committed stroke, and then watch the ball track toward the hole only to make that final little turn away from you. You don’t argue with a golf ball. It doesn’t care.

The most satisfying holes were the ones where the entire sequence worked. Good drive, favorable lie, properly selected club, solid approach, manageable first putt. Those are the holes that don’t necessarily produce birdies but feel like good golf. A par built that way is worth more to me than a fortunate par assembled through a series of recoveries and missed opportunities. There is a difference between scoring and playing well, and the two aren’t always synonymous.

I had a few birdie looks during the round, although nothing turned into some ridiculous string of red numbers on the card. The better birdie opportunities generally came from giving myself reasonable approach distances rather than trying to manufacture something from a poor position. That’s one of the things I’ve become more conscious of as my appreciation for the technical side of golf has increased. The game is fundamentally about avoiding unnecessary difficult shots. If you can eliminate the thirty-yard recovery pitch from behind a tree, the delicate flop shot over a bunker, or the seventy-foot putt because you three-putted the previous hole, you’ve already made the game considerably easier.

There were, naturally, a few shots that reminded me I am still playing golf rather than conducting a controlled experiment.

A couple of tee shots wandered. A couple of approach shots finished farther from the hole than I had intended. There were probably a few putts that deserved better strokes and a few strokes that deserved worse putts. That’s the normal distribution of a golf round. You don’t need eighteen perfect holes to have a good day. In fact, expecting that is probably one of the quickest ways to turn golf into an unpleasant activity.

The course itself was beautiful in that particular late-summer, early-autumn way that New England does so well. The rain had darkened the soil and deepened the color of the grass. The fairways had that almost unnatural green quality they get when they’re holding moisture, while the rough had a slightly heavier appearance underfoot. The trees were still predominantly green, although there were subtle hints that the season was beginning to turn. The afternoon light became softer as the round progressed, and by the back nine there was that unmistakable September feeling that the day was slowly running out of daylight.

That became increasingly apparent on the final few holes.

By the time I reached the closing stretch, the sun had dropped below the horizon and there was only a thin amount of daylight remaining. I wasn’t playing in darkness, exactly, but the course had entered that strange twilight period where the sky is still bright enough to see the fairway while everything around it begins to lose definition. Golf at that hour has its own character. The trees become silhouettes, the shadows stretch across the fairways, and the white golf ball becomes increasingly important because it is about the only thing on the course that still announces its location with any enthusiasm.

It also makes you appreciate how much of golf depends upon visual information. A shot that would be completely ordinary at three in the afternoon suddenly requires more concentration when the background behind the flag is becoming indistinct. You start paying closer attention to the shape of the green, the position of bunkers, the edge of the fairway, and the landmarks you’ve already established in your mind during the round.

The damp ground remained noticeable all the way through the finish. Walking between shots, you could feel the moisture in the turf, and the course had that soft, almost springy quality beneath the spikes. It wasn’t sloppy, and thankfully there was no need to play lift-clean-and-place golf in my head, but it was enough to affect the interaction between club and turf. The divots were deeper in places, the ball wasn’t necessarily getting the same amount of release after landing, and approaches required a little more thought about carry distance rather than total distance.

That’s one of the things I enjoy about golf: the course isn’t static. The same hole can ask a different question depending on temperature, wind, moisture, grass conditions, pin placement, and even the time of day. You aren’t simply playing the layout. You’re playing the conditions.

And today the conditions were excellent.

The round itself was exactly what I had hoped it would be when I threw the clubs into the M8. No heroic score, no disastrous blow-up, no miraculous round that will have me talking about it for the next six months. Just eighteen holes of decent-to-good golf on a beautiful September afternoon, with enough well-struck shots to remind me why I enjoy the game and enough imperfect ones to keep the handicap honest.

That’s really all I’m looking for on a day like this.

I left the course with the daylight essentially gone, clubs back in the car, shoes carrying a little evidence of the damp turf, and the pleasantly tired feeling that comes from walking eighteen holes and concentrating on every shot for several hours. The hospital would still be there tomorrow. The pager would still find me. The operating room would still have its add-ons, the trauma bay would still produce its surprises, and there would inevitably be another long day waiting.

But Monday gave me a few hours.

I spent them exactly where I wanted to be: standing over a golf ball, trying to make a little white sphere behave according to a plan that was usually much better than my execution.

And honestly, that’s a pretty good way to spend a September afternoon.

THE CLUB OF PERFECTLY REASONABLE SMOKERS

He regarded smoking not merely as a habit but as a highly organized branch of personal philosophy. Each morning he lit his first cigarette with the solemnity of a man beginning an important scientific experiment, drew the entire thing into himself in one magnificent inhalation, and expressed silent gratitude to the manufacturer for having thoughtfully installed a filter at the far end. It was reassuring to know that someone, somewhere, was looking after him.

He immediately lit another.

This one he decided to enjoy more slowly. He inhaled deeply, held the smoke in his lungs, and contemplated the pleasant menthol freshness spreading through his chest. It seemed to him that modern civilization had achieved something remarkable: a recreational activity capable of making a person cough while simultaneously convincing him that he was refreshing himself.

Before long, there was a knock at the door. Several friends entered, each carrying cigarettes, and within seconds the room had become a small, enthusiastic convention devoted entirely to smoking. They sat around puffing contentedly, nodding to one another with the quiet satisfaction of people who had discovered an important shared interest.

“This,” he thought, “is what fellowship must be.”

They talked about cigarettes. They talked about smoking. They discussed different brands, different ways of lighting them, and the particular pleasure of filling an otherwise perfectly breathable room with a dense gray fog. Whenever anyone finished a cigarette, someone else immediately produced another, as though the supply of tobacco were a matter of profound communal responsibility.

Eventually they began singing.

Nobody knew why. Perhaps it was the smoke. Perhaps it was the camaraderie. Perhaps there was simply nothing else left to do. In any event, several traditional songs were adapted to celebrate their chosen pastime, and the group sang them enthusiastically while clouds of smoke drifted toward the ceiling.

Hours passed. One by one, the guests finally departed, each pausing at the door to light one last cigarette before leaving. He returned to his chair, alone at last, and smiled contentedly. The house was quiet. The room was hazy. The evening stretched peacefully ahead of him.

He raised another cigarette to his mouth.

There was just one minor inconvenience.

His lips fell off.

THE AFTERNOON THE IDIOTS DROPPED BY

I was sitting quietly at home one afternoon, looking through the blinds at the neighbors and generally attending to matters that were none of my business, when the doorbell rang.

“Who is it?” I called.

“We don’t know,” came the answer.

That was enough.

The Dopes had arrived.

I opened the door and found the usual group standing on the porch. They were not particularly bright men, but they were friendly, and there is something to be said for company that requires almost no intellectual preparation. I invited them inside.

“What brings you gentlemen over?” I asked.

“Yep,” said one.

“Yep,” said another.

“Yep.”

“Yep.”

I nodded thoughtfully, as though I had just received four separate and highly persuasive explanations.

“Would anybody like some coffee?”

One of them stared at me for a moment.

“Gosh,” he finally said, “how long have we been here?”

“About two minutes.”

He looked genuinely alarmed.

“Two minutes? We should have left hours ago.”

This apparently settled the matter.

Without another word, they began gathering their belongings. Unfortunately, some of the things they gathered belonged to me. They loaded up a few of my possessions, shuffled toward the door, and lumbered down the steps as though this had been the arrangement all along.

“Goodbye, Dopes!” I called after them.

They stopped at the end of the walk, turned around, and shouted back:

“Goodbye, you big fucking idiot!”

Then they disappeared down the road with my things.

I closed the door.

It had been a surprisingly productive afternoon.

THE CORPSE WHO KNEW TOO MUCH

Old Pops had been dead for two days.

There was very little room for disagreement about the matter. He had become stiff, pale, and increasingly green, and the undertakers had already placed him on the preparation table where two elderly morticians were making the usual arrangements. They were cheerful men, surprisingly comfortable around death, and treated their work with the relaxed familiarity of people who had spent many years dealing with the recently departed.

“Can’t complain,” one of them remarked. “He made it to a good old age.”

“Sure did,” said the other. “Might as well get started.”

They had barely begun when Old Pops sat bolt upright.

Neither mortician moved.

Old Pops did not open his eyes. He did not appear particularly interested in the fact that he was sitting upright on a marble slab after having been dead for forty-eight hours. Instead, he began speaking in a clear, measured voice, as though continuing a conversation that had been interrupted sometime in the eighteenth century.

“In 1743, Captain Rice departed England aboard a ship whose crew was neither dependable nor particularly fond of their commander. Three days into the voyage, disaster struck. The mainmast splintered under the strain and eventually snapped in two, leaving the vessel at the mercy of the sea.”

The morticians stared at one another.

Old Pops continued.

“For the next several days the ship was tossed about in rough water. The crew, already dissatisfied with Captain Rice, took the opportunity to mutiny. Their rebellion lasted until another vessel appeared on the horizon and came to their rescue. Captain Rice, showing considerable discretion, neglected to report the mutiny to his superior officer. The crew, grateful to have survived and apparently relieved not to have been hanged, subsequently became loyal, industrious, and devoted sailors.”

Old Pops finished the story.

He lowered himself carefully back onto the slab, closed his eyes, and became completely motionless.

The two morticians remained silent.

Neither seemed particularly interested in continuing with the embalming.

Finally, one of them looked at the other.

“Well,” he said, “I suppose that settles one thing.”

“What’s that?”

“So much for the old saying that dead men tell no tales.”

The Unfortunate People of Turdsmania

The people of Turdsmania never quite received the welcome they deserved in America. Their principal problem was not their appearance, their manners, their politics, or even their rather unusual customs. It was simply the name of their homeland.

The Turds were, by all historical accounts, an impressive people. They tended to be tall and healthy, with long, straight hair. The men were broad-shouldered and vigorous, while the women were famously confident and striking. They had apparently developed a perfectly respectable civilization in Turdsmania and had little reason to suspect that immigration would present any particular difficulty.

Their first representatives arrived in America in 1589, shortly after the Spanish Armada had met its unfortunate fate. Unfortunately for the Turds, the Spanish defeat was followed by a remark from one of the defeated admirals concerning the quality of the men who had been responsible for operating his cannons.

The remark was repeated.

The name stuck.

The Turds had barely established themselves before encountering a second problem. They needed somewhere to live. Boarding houses throughout the colonies displayed signs announcing their restrictions, and among the most common was the simple declaration:

NO TURDS.

To the Turds, this appeared to be an explicit rejection of their nationality. They naturally assumed the signs meant that residents of Turdsmania were unwelcome.

They were understandably offended.

The situation became even more confusing when some of them decided that perhaps America was not the place for them after all and arranged passage back to their homeland. Once aboard ship, the returning immigrants naturally had questions about where they were supposed to sleep.

“Where do the Turds stay?” one of them asked a sailor.

The sailor, assuming the question concerned some obscure naval examination or perhaps a joke he had not yet understood, answered without hesitation.

“In the can, sir.”

The Turds accepted this as an instruction.

For the remainder of the voyage, the entire group spent their nights crowded into the ship’s lavatory.

No one thought to clarify the misunderstanding.

Fortunately, things improved considerably once they reached Turdsmania. There, at least, the name carried no stigma. A man could walk down the street, encounter another citizen, and introduce himself without hesitation.

“I’m a Turd.”

The other person could smile proudly.

“So am I.”

For the first time in their lives, they had discovered the extraordinary comfort of living in a country where the most embarrassing thing about their name was that everyone else had finally learned how to pronounce it.

The Forgotten Garden of El Camino Real

Just beyond San Diego, near one of the old Spanish missions, there is said to be a remarkable little tract of land that has somehow survived centuries of development, tourism, and the relentless American desire to put a hotel wherever there happens to be an attractive view. Locals know it as the Forgotten Garden of El Camino Real, although its history is considerably less picturesque than the name suggests.

According to the oldest account, the garden came into existence in 1573, shortly after the local mission Indians were introduced to the culinary habits of the newly arrived Europeans. The results were immediate and apparently memorable. What began as an unfortunate consequence of dietary experimentation gradually became a permanent feature of the landscape.

The missionaries eventually became concerned about preserving what they regarded as proper European customs and eliminating various native traditions, but the garden was somehow spared. The official explanation, attributed to one particularly exasperated priest, was that removing it presented “an accumulation of difficulties.”

That description proved remarkably durable.

For centuries the garden remained largely undisturbed, shaded by mature magnolias and sustained by the peculiar combination of soil, climate, and historical neglect that seems to produce the most enduring monuments. Nobody considered it particularly important, but nobody quite managed to get rid of it either.

Then, in 1952, the place was rediscovered.

Almost immediately, the public developed an appreciation for its historical significance. Conservationists arrived. Historians began taking an interest. Local officials realized that people might actually travel considerable distances to see an attraction that had been sitting quietly beside the road for hundreds of years.

The garden was declared worth preserving.

Even the hotel industry, normally a reliable enemy of undeveloped land with convenient access to tourists, apparently recognized that this particular piece of property should remain untouched. One major hotel company considered building nearby but ultimately decided that the historic site was too valuable to disturb.

And so the garden remains.

The magnolias still provide shade. The sea air still drifts inland from the Pacific. Tourists still wander along El Camino Real, occasionally stopping to admire the scenery without fully appreciating the peculiar historical accident that has survived beneath the trees.

There are, of course, more conventional monuments in California. Missions. Forts. Historic homes. Museums. Old roads.

But few have quite the cultural persistence of the garden that nobody could remove.

Centuries pass. Customs change. Cities grow. Hotels rise and disappear.

And somewhere outside San Diego, the past continues to smell exactly as it did when someone first decided that perhaps European cuisine had been a mistake.